What type of evidence is considered “circumstantial”?

Circumstantial evidence is characterized by its nature of implying facts without providing direct proof. Unlike direct evidence, which can unequivocally establish a fact (for instance, a security camera recording an event), circumstantial evidence relies on inference. It might consist of a series of facts that, when considered together, suggest a particular conclusion.

For instance, if a suspect's fingerprints are found at a crime scene, it does not directly show they committed the crime, but it implies they were present, thus allowing for a series of deductions that could lead to stronger conclusions about their involvement. This type of evidence requires a logical connection to the fact in question rather than a straightforward assertion.

The other types of evidence, such as eyewitness testimonies or personal accounts, fall under categories that can provide direct observations or claims, which differ significantly from the inherent nature of circumstantial evidence.