What is a notable limitation of video evidence in forensics?

Video evidence plays a significant role in forensic investigations, but it does come with certain limitations. One notable limitation is related to the clarity of the captured resolution. Video footage can vary greatly in quality, depending on the technology used, environmental conditions, and the purpose for which the footage was recorded.

In many instances, videos may be recorded with low resolution or in poor lighting conditions, resulting in images that may be too blurry or pixelated to be useful for forensic analysis. This lack of clarity can hinder the ability to identify individuals, vehicles, or other crucial details that are critical in investigations. Additionally, if a video is grainy or has significant motion blur, the information it provides might be inconclusive or misinterpreted.

Other aspects, such as the cost of video recording equipment, the accessibility of video footage, or the speed of video playback, while they can be relevant in certain contexts, do not directly affect the utility of the evidence itself in the way that resolution clarity does. High-quality video systems are often available at reasonable prices, and while accessibility can be a concern, it does not fundamentally limit the type of evidence that can be obtained from video in the same way that resolution does. Similarly, the speed of playback may impact how evidence is